Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00
据龙先生介绍，数天后，他母亲收到了一条“包裹已滞留需处理”的某快递短信，母亲打电话过去，对方声称是快递的客服，说要帮母亲“关闭某短视频平台上的百万保障扣费”。幸好，母亲通话的时候，又被一旁的龙先生听到了，马上上前阻止，对着电话的另一头进行了呵斥。
。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
Kevin Church/BBC News，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
Lauren Hirst,North West
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.